Presentation of Lease Receivables by PSU Financing Arm of Indian Railways

Facts of the case: A Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) dedicated to mobilizing funds for the Indian Railways, operating as a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) under RBI, sought clarification on presenting ‘Lease Receivables’ in its financial statements.

Background: The PSU borrows funds for asset acquisition, leasing them to Indian Railways. Historically, ‘Lease Receivables’ were shown as part of ‘Receivables’ on the Balance Sheet per Ind AS 17/Ind AS 116 read with Division III to Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013.

Queries Raised: Below queries were raised –

  • Is the current presentation of ‘Lease Receivables’ as part of ‘Receivables’ appropriate?
  • If not, what is the correct presentation?

Company’s Stand: The Corporation argued that, as per Ind AS 116, lease receivables should be shown as receivables to underscore its identity as a leasing company.

EAC Analysis:

  • Division III of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 mandates that ‘Lease Receivables’ should be shown under ‘Financial Assets’ à‘Loans’.
  • Ind AS 116 aligns with this, requiring net investment in leases to be presented as a receivable.
  • The Corporation’s primary role in financing asset acquisition for Indian Railways supports the classification of ‘Lease Receivables’ under ‘Loans’.

Guidance Note: As per the Guidance Note on Division III – Schedule III for NBFCs, ‘Leasing’ should be disclosed under ‘Loans’ in the notes.

Conclusion:

  • Presenting ‘Lease Receivables’ as part of ‘Receivables’ does not align with Ind AS or the Companies Act.
  • ‘Lease Receivables’ should be shown under ‘Loans’ under ‘Financial Assets’ on the Balance Sheet.
  • Additional disclosure requirements, including maturity analysis per Ind AS 116, must be met.
SW Point of View:

The presentation of ‘Lease Receivables’ as part of ‘Receivables’ on the Company’s Balance Sheet is not compliant with Ind AS and Schedule III requirements. ‘Lease Receivables’ should be reclassified under ‘Loans’ within ‘Financial Assets’ to align with regulatory standards.

Shruti Bawa, Audit Associate, SW